2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1996 Volkswagen Passat
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volkswagen Passat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volkswagen Passat would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 310 more horse power than 1996 Volkswagen Passat. (150 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1996 Volkswagen Passat.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Passat, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Volkswagen Passat (210 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1996 Volkswagen Passat will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford ST 460 | 1996 Volkswagen Passat | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | ST 460 | Passat |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 210 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2710 mm |