2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1999 Acura EL
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Acura EL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Acura EL would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 333 more horse power than 1999 Acura EL. (127 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1999 Acura EL.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Acura EL. (145 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford ST 460 | 1999 Acura EL | |
| Make | Ford | Acura |
| Model | ST 460 | EL |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 460 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4478 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1704 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2619 mm |
