2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. (276 HP @ 9000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv (214 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv has automatic transmission and 2000 Ford ST 460 has manual transmission. 2000 Ford ST 460 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford ST 460 | 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | ST 460 | RX-Evolv |
Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 9000 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 214 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1770 mm |