2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 2003 Morgan Aero 8
To start off, 2003 Morgan Aero 8 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford ST 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford ST 460 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 2003 Morgan Aero 8. (282 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 2003 Morgan Aero 8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Morgan Aero 8 (438 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 2003 Morgan Aero 8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford ST 460 | 2003 Morgan Aero 8 | |
Make | Ford | Morgan |
Model | ST 460 | Aero 8 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 4398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 438 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2530 mm |