2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 2003 Subaru B
To start off, 2003 Subaru B is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford ST 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford ST 460 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2003 Subaru B. (389 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru B.
Because 2003 Subaru B is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford ST 460. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru B will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Subaru B (550 Nm) has 372 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 2003 Subaru B will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460. 2003 Subaru B has automatic transmission and 2000 Ford ST 460 has manual transmission. 2000 Ford ST 460 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Subaru B will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford ST 460 | 2003 Subaru B | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | ST 460 | B |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 389 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 550 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2680 mm |