2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 2003 Volvo S40
To start off, 2003 Volvo S40 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford ST 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford ST 460 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 337 more horse power than 2003 Volvo S40. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo S40.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Volvo S40. (165 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford ST 460 | 2003 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | ST 460 | S40 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 460 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2570 mm |
