2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford ST 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford ST 460 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Magna. (188 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Magna.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Magna (255 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Magna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford ST 460 | 2004 Mitsubishi Magna | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | ST 460 | Magna |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 188 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 255 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2730 mm |