2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford ST 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford ST 460 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 253 more horse power than 2004 Volvo XC90. (207 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo XC90.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford ST 460. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford ST 460 | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | ST 460 | XC90 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 460 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2860 mm |
