2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 2008 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2008 Ford Ranger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford ST 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford ST 460 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP) has 319 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ranger. (141 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ranger.
Because 2008 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford ST 460. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Ranger (330 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 2008 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford ST 460 | 2008 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | ST 460 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 141 HP |
Torque | 178 Nm | 330 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2990 mm |