2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 2008 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2008 Honda CR-V is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford ST 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford ST 460 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 322 more horse power than 2008 Honda CR-V. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 2008 Honda CR-V.
Because 2008 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford ST 460. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Honda CR-V (341 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 2008 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford ST 460 | 2008 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | ST 460 | CR-V |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2204 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 341 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2640 mm |