2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 2008 Rover 75

To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford ST 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford ST 460 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 285 more horse power than 2008 Rover 75. (175 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 2008 Rover 75.

Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (240 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460. 2008 Rover 75 has automatic transmission and 2000 Ford ST 460 has manual transmission. 2000 Ford ST 460 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Rover 75 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: