2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 2009 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2009 Nissan Rogue is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford ST 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford ST 460 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 290 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Rogue. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Rogue.
Because 2009 Nissan Rogue is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford ST 460. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Rogue will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 2009 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford ST 460 | 2009 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | ST 460 | Rogue |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |