2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 2010 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2010 Nissan GT-R is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford ST 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford ST 460 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan GT-R (485 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2000 Ford ST 460. (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan GT-R should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Because 2010 Nissan GT-R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford ST 460. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan GT-R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan GT-R (588 Nm) has 410 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 2010 Nissan GT-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford ST 460 | 2010 Nissan GT-R | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | ST 460 | GT-R |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 485 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 588 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4651 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1902 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2779 mm |