2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 2011 Audi RS3
To start off, 2011 Audi RS3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford ST 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford ST 460 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP) has 125 more horse power than 2011 Audi RS3. (335 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 2011 Audi RS3.
Because 2011 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford ST 460. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi RS3 (450 Nm) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 2011 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460. 2011 Audi RS3 has automatic transmission and 2000 Ford ST 460 has manual transmission. 2000 Ford ST 460 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Audi RS3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford ST 460 | 2011 Audi RS3 | |
| Make | Ford | Audi |
| Model | ST 460 | RS3 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 460 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 7-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
