2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 2012 Opel Vivaro
To start off, 2012 Opel Vivaro is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford ST 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford ST 460 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 359 more horse power than 2012 Opel Vivaro. (101 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 2012 Opel Vivaro.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Vivaro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Opel Vivaro (240 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 2012 Opel Vivaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford ST 460 | 2012 Opel Vivaro | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | ST 460 | Vivaro |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1970 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3100 mm |