2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 2012 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford ST 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford ST 460 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 356 more horse power than 2012 Volkswagen Polo. (104 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 2012 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volkswagen Polo. (175 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford ST 460 | 2012 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
| Model | ST 460 | Polo |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 460 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1682 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2470 mm |
