2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 2013 Kia Optima
To start off, 2013 Kia Optima is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford ST 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford ST 460 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 2013 Kia Optima. (197 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 2013 Kia Optima.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Kia Optima (252 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 2013 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford ST 460 | 2013 Kia Optima | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | ST 460 | Optima |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 252 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4845 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2795 mm |