2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz M
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz M is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford ST 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford ST 460 would be higher. Both 2000 Ford ST 460 and 2013 Mercedes-Benz M are equipped with a 4,600 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2013 Mercedes-Benz M. (397 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 2013 Mercedes-Benz M.
Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz M is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford ST 460. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz M will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz M (601 Nm) has 423 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford ST 460 | 2013 Mercedes-Benz M | |
| Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | ST 460 | M |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 460 HP | 397 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 601 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4804 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2141 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2915 mm |
