2000 Ford Taurus vs. 1962 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2000 Ford Taurus is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 2,933 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Taurus (156 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Taurus weights approximately 1141 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Taurus (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Taurus | 1962 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taurus | R 360 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Size | 2933 cc | 355 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 22 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 60 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 63 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1521 kg | 380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 1770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |