2000 Ford Taurus vs. 1964 MG 1100
To start off, 2000 Ford Taurus is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 2,933 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Taurus (156 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Taurus weights approximately 696 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Taurus (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Taurus | 1964 MG 1100 | |
Make | Ford | MG |
Model | Taurus | 1100 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2933 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1521 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2380 mm |