2000 Ford Taurus vs. 1978 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Ford Taurus is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Taurus (154 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 626. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Taurus weights approximately 482 kg more than 1978 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Taurus (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 626. (150 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 626. 2000 Ford Taurus has automatic transmission and 1978 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1978 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Taurus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Taurus | 1978 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taurus | 626 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 1768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1477 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2520 mm |