2000 Ford Taurus vs. 1992 Acura Integra
To start off, 2000 Ford Taurus is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Acura Integra would be higher. At 2,933 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford Taurus has automatic transmission and 1992 Acura Integra has manual transmission. 1992 Acura Integra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Taurus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Taurus | 1992 Acura Integra | |
| Make | Ford | Acura |
| Model | Taurus | Integra |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2933 cc | 1700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2560 mm |
