2000 Ford Taurus vs. 1996 Suzuki Baleno

To start off, 2000 Ford Taurus is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Suzuki Baleno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Suzuki Baleno would be higher. At 2,933 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Taurus (156 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (98 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Taurus weights approximately 486 kg more than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Taurus (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (133 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. 2000 Ford Taurus has automatic transmission and 1996 Suzuki Baleno has manual transmission. 1996 Suzuki Baleno will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Taurus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Ford Taurus 1996 Suzuki Baleno
Make Ford Suzuki
Model Taurus Baleno
Year Released 2000 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2933 cc 1589 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 156 HP 98 HP
Engine RPM 4900 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 244 Nm 133 Nm
Torque RPM 3950 RPM 3200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 88.9 mm 75 mm
Engine Stroke Size 78.7 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.3:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1521 kg 1035 kg
Vehicle Length 5030 mm 4350 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2490 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 51 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]