2000 Ford Taurus vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Taurus would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Taurus weights approximately 43 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Taurus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Taurus (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Taurus | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Ford | Mini |
| Model | Taurus | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1521 kg | 1478 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 47 L |
