2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2000 Ford TL-50 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,798 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TL-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TL-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TL-50 should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TL-50 weights approximately 802 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 538 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TL-50 | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | TL-50 | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 500 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2060 mm |
