2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110
To start off, 2000 Ford TL-50 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110 would be higher. At 1,895 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TL-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TL-50 should accelerate faster than 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110 weights approximately 83 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 428 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110. (142 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TL-50 | 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110 | |
| Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | TL-50 | W 110 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1895 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1385 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 52 L |
