2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 1969 Holden Belmont
To start off, 2000 Ford TL-50 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,034 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Holden Belmont (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TL-50 weights approximately 27 kg more than 1969 Holden Belmont.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 323 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Holden Belmont. (247 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TL-50 | 1969 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | TL-50 | Belmont |
Year Released | 2000 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 3034 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 247 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1275 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2830 mm |