2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 1993 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2000 Ford TL-50 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 1993 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Ford Falcon (268 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Ford Falcon weights approximately 343 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Ford Falcon. (420 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TL-50 | 1993 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | TL-50 | Falcon |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 4941 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 268 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 420 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1645 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2800 mm |
