2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 1994 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2000 Ford TL-50 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Thunderbird (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 318 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Thunderbird. (291 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TL-50 | 1994 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | TL-50 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 291 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1620 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 60 L |