2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 1996 Kia Clarus
To start off, 2000 Ford TL-50 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Kia Clarus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Kia Clarus would be higher. At 1,798 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TL-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TL-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1996 Kia Clarus. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TL-50 should accelerate faster than 1996 Kia Clarus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TL-50 weights approximately 82 kg more than 1996 Kia Clarus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford TL-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TL-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Kia Clarus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 418 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Kia Clarus. (152 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Kia Clarus.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TL-50 | 1996 Kia Clarus | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | TL-50 | Clarus |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 152 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1220 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2670 mm |