2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 2000 Volkswagen AAC
To start off, both 2000 Ford TL-50 and 2000 Volkswagen AAC were released in the same year (2000). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 4,921 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Volkswagen AAC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volkswagen AAC (309 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen AAC should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volkswagen AAC weights approximately 72 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Volkswagen AAC is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TL-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen AAC will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volkswagen AAC (765 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TL-50. (570 Nm). This means 2000 Volkswagen AAC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TL-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TL-50 | 2000 Volkswagen AAC | |
| Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
| Model | TL-50 | AAC |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 4921 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 309 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 765 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1374 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 55 L |
