2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 2002 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJR is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TL-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TL-50 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 262 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 363 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jaguar XJR. (525 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jaguar XJR.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TL-50 | 2002 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | TL-50 | XJR |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 525 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1665 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2910 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 85 L |
