2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 2002 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2002 Toyota Tundra is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TL-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TL-50 would be higher. At 4,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TL-50 weights approximately 379 kg more than 2002 Toyota Tundra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Toyota Tundra. (427 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TL-50 | 2002 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | TL-50 | Tundra |
Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 4698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 427 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 923 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 70 L |