2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 2004 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2004 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TL-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TL-50 would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln Navigator (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 1290 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lincoln Navigator. (481 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lincoln Navigator.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TL-50 | 2004 Lincoln Navigator | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | TL-50 | Navigator |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 5406 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 481 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 2592 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 106 L |