2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 2004 Mazda B4000
To start off, 2004 Mazda B4000 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TL-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TL-50 would be higher. At 4,031 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B4000 (207 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B4000 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B4000 weights approximately 365 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mazda B4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TL-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B4000. (323 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TL-50 | 2004 Mazda B4000 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | TL-50 | B4000 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 4031 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 323 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1667 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 74 L |
