2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 2005 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2005 GMC Sierra is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TL-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TL-50 would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Sierra (295 HP) has 167 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1013 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Sierra. (454 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TL-50 | 2005 GMC Sierra | |
| Make | Ford | GMC |
| Model | TL-50 | Sierra |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 5359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 295 HP |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 454 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 2315 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 98 L |
