2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 2006 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2006 GMC Canyon is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TL-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TL-50 would be higher. At 3,458 cc, 2006 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Canyon (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Canyon weights approximately 1133 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TL-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 GMC Canyon. (305 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TL-50 | 2006 GMC Canyon | |
| Make | Ford | GMC |
| Model | TL-50 | Canyon |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 3458 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 2435 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 72 L |
