2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 2007 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2007 Honda CR-V is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TL-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TL-50 would be higher. At 2,354 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Honda CR-V (166 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Honda CR-V weights approximately 688 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2007 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TL-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 352 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TL-50 | 2007 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | TL-50 | CR-V |
Year Released | 2000 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 166 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 218 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1990 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 58 L |