2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 2007 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2007 Nissan Murano is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TL-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TL-50 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Nissan Murano (240 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50.
Because 2007 Nissan Murano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TL-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Murano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Nissan Murano. (331 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Nissan Murano.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TL-50 | 2007 Nissan Murano | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | TL-50 | Murano |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 3498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 331 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 82 L |
