2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 2008 Saturn Aura
To start off, 2008 Saturn Aura is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TL-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TL-50 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Saturn Aura is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Saturn Aura (253 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Saturn Aura should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TL-50 weights approximately 17 kg more than 2008 Saturn Aura.
Because 2000 Ford TL-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TL-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Saturn Aura, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Saturn Aura. (340 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Saturn Aura.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TL-50 | 2008 Saturn Aura | |
Make | Ford | Saturn |
Model | TL-50 | Aura |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 253 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 340 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 61 L |