2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 2009 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TL-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TL-50 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (395 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Mustang. (240 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TL-50 | 2009 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | TL-50 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 395 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2740 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 55 L |
