2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 2010 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2010 Chrysler 300 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TL-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TL-50 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chrysler 300 (360 HP @ 5150 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chrysler 300. (527 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TL-50 | 2010 Chrysler 300 | |
| Make | Ford | Chrysler |
| Model | TL-50 | 300 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 360 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5150 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 527 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3048 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 72 L |
