2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TL-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TL-50 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Dodge Ram. (235 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Dodge Ram. 2000 Ford TL-50 has automatic transmission and 2010 Dodge Ram has manual transmission. 2010 Dodge Ram will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford TL-50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TL-50 | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Ford | Dodge |
| Model | TL-50 | Ram |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 235 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 98 L |
