2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 2010 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2010 Ford Falcon is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TL-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TL-50 would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Falcon (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Falcon weights approximately 402 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Falcon. (391 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TL-50 | 2010 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | TL-50 | Falcon |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 391 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1704 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2838 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 68 L |