2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TL-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TL-50 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (242 HP) has 114 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50.
Because 2000 Ford TL-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TL-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TL-50 | 2012 Audi A6 | |
| Make | Ford | Audi |
| Model | TL-50 | A6 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 242 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2911 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 75 L |
