2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 2012 Lancia Ypsilon
To start off, 2012 Lancia Ypsilon is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TL-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TL-50 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TL-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TL-50 (128 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2012 Lancia Ypsilon. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TL-50 should accelerate faster than 2012 Lancia Ypsilon.
Because 2000 Ford TL-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TL-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Lancia Ypsilon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford TL-50 has automatic transmission and 2012 Lancia Ypsilon has manual transmission. 2012 Lancia Ypsilon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford TL-50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TL-50 | 2012 Lancia Ypsilon | |
Make | Ford | Lancia |
Model | TL-50 | Ypsilon |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 68 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2390 mm |