2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 2013 Chrysler 300

To start off, 2013 Chrysler 300 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TL-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TL-50 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chrysler 300 (358 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 746 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chrysler 300. (534 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chrysler 300.

Compare all specifications: