2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1954 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,693 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TS-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1954 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TS-50 should accelerate faster than 1954 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Talbot Baby weights approximately 442 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 1954 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Ford | Talbot |
| Model | TS-50 | Baby |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2693 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1650 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3130 mm |
