2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1956 Morris Minor
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Morris Minor would be higher. At 1,989 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TS-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TS-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1956 Morris Minor. (30 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TS-50 should accelerate faster than 1956 Morris Minor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TS-50 weights approximately 383 kg more than 1956 Morris Minor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TS-50 (175 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Morris Minor. (54 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TS-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Morris Minor.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 1956 Morris Minor | |
| Make | Ford | Morris |
| Model | TS-50 | Minor |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 803 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 30 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 54 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 825 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2190 mm |
