2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1964 Skoda 1202
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TS-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TS-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1964 Skoda 1202. (45 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TS-50 should accelerate faster than 1964 Skoda 1202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TS-50 weights approximately 103 kg more than 1964 Skoda 1202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TS-50 (175 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Skoda 1202. (86 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TS-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Skoda 1202.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 1964 Skoda 1202 | |
Make | Ford | Skoda |
Model | TS-50 | 1202 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1221 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 86 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1105 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 30 L |